Discussion Blog— first 5 students, choose one case from the “Ethics Bowl Cases 2004”,
do Step II of the SMA, build on the previous work on this case (see last week’s
Discussion Blog); second 5 or so students, choose one case from the previous 5 students
(from “Ethics Bowl Cases 2004”), do Step III of the SMA, build on the previous work on
this case (see last week’s Discussion Blog and the previous posts for this week).
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
Unit 7 (Systematic Moral Analysis, Step I) Assignment
Discussion Blog— Choose one case from the “Ethics Bowl Cases 2004”. For this case,
do Step I of the SMA, “What’s the problem?” Do not choose a case that has already been
posted by another student.
do Step I of the SMA, “What’s the problem?” Do not choose a case that has already been
posted by another student.
Wednesday, March 9, 2016
Unit 6 (Ethics in the Workplace and Role-related Responsibilities) Assignment
Discussion Blog—for all of these assignments, refer to your profession’s code of ethics
and emphasize elements of your code that are morally required and/or conventional: 1st 5
students, list 5 role related responsibilities for your profession that the public can
reasonably expect of you; 2nd 5 or so students, list 5 role related responsibilities that
colleagues/coworkers can reasonably expect of you.
and emphasize elements of your code that are morally required and/or conventional: 1st 5
students, list 5 role related responsibilities for your profession that the public can
reasonably expect of you; 2nd 5 or so students, list 5 role related responsibilities that
colleagues/coworkers can reasonably expect of you.
Wednesday, March 2, 2016
Unit 5 (Professions & Professional Ethics in America) Assignment
Discussion Blog: 1st 5 students, using Ritchie as a guide, apply the ten criteria to evaluate your profession; 2nd 5 or so students, using Davis as a guide, explain how understanding a code of ethics as a convention can be useful in your profession.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)